Use of the term ‘physical relations’ without evidence not sufficient to establish rape: Delhi High Court In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court emphasized that mere reference to “physical relations” in a complaint or statement is not adequate to legally establish the occurrence of rape. The court underscored the importance of concrete and corroborative evidence when interpreting such terms within the context of criminal proceedings. The judgment highlights that the phrase “physical relations” can be ambiguous and may not necessarily imply non-consensual sexual intercourse. It could potentially refer to consensual physical contact or interaction of a non-sexual nature unless the circumstances clearly indicate otherwise. Therefore, relying solely on the use of this phrase, without supporting evidence, is insufficient to prove the elements required to substantiate a charge of rape. The Delhi High Court’s decision serves as a critical reminder for courts and law enforcement agencies to carefully evaluate the nature and context of the statements made by the complainant. The court reiterated the necessity of thorough investigation and corroboration through medical reports, witness testimonies, and other material evidence before concluding that a rape has taken place. This ruling aims to ensure that accusations of a serious and sensitive nature such as rape are not based on ambiguous language alone, and that due process is followed to protect the rights of all parties involved. It reinforces the principle that legal conclusions must rest on credible, substantive proof rather than mere allegations or vague terminology.
