The Washington Post
TIME
AP News
CBS News
U.S. Investigation Into Minneapolis Shooting of Alex Pretti Appears Limited
✍️ Editor: Sudhir Choudhary
📅 January 27, 2026
The federal investigation into the fatal shooting of Alex Pretti in Minneapolis appears constrained in scope, prompting widespread concern from local officials, legal experts, and civil liberties advocates about transparency, accountability and independent review.
Pretti, a 37-year-old intensive care nurse, was shot and killed by a U.S. Border Patrol agent on January 24 during a large immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis known as Operation Metro Surge. The incident has sparked sustained protests, political debate, and mounting pressure for a full investigative process.
Federal Probes Underway but Not Fully Independent
Federal officials have said multiple investigations are ongoing, but details about their scope remain sparse. White House press secretary statements confirm that agencies including the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation are involved. However, experts and local authorities note that the FBI’s role appears limited nearly exclusively to supporting forensic work rather than leading a standard criminal civil-rights inquiry.
Under typical practice in officer-involved shootings, the FBI and the U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division would investigate potential violations of federal civil-rights laws. In this case, there is no indication that the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division plans to open its own inquiry into the Pretti shooting, raising questions among legal observers.
Preservation and Access to Evidence Remains Contested
Judicial proceedings in federal court have highlighted disputes over access to critical evidence. A judge has ordered DHS to preserve body-camera footage and other materials related to the case after concerns were raised that the agency could otherwise manage or restrict access to key records. Minnesota prosecutors say federal agents initially denied state investigators entry to the scene, despite warrants, intensifying scrutiny over how evidence is being handled.
The preservation order followed arguments by Minnesota officials that federal authorities’ handling of the scene and evidence collection appeared irregular. The judge’s ruling does not extend to immediate release of the footage to state investigators but does prevent evidence destruction amid continuing legal disputes.
Bipartisan Calls for Transparency and Independent Review
Lawmakers from both political parties have publicly called for transparent and independent investigations into the Pretti shooting. Republican and Democratic senators have voiced support for a probe beyond internal reviews, stressing the need for accountability and clear factual determinations about use of lethal force by federal agents.
These calls are amplified by ongoing public protests in Minneapolis and other cities, with demonstrators demanding both federal and state collaboration on investigative efforts. Minnesota officials and civil rights advocates argue that trust in the process hinges on a genuinely independent review, especially given conflicting narratives from federal authorities and video evidence.
Federal–State Tensions Over Investigation
The interaction between state and federal authorities has been marked by contention. Minnesota officials have alleged obstruction in permitting state crime investigators access to the shooting scene. According to local authorities, federal agencies initially prevented state investigators from securing evidence immediately after the incident — a move that has intensified criticism of the investigation’s scope and impartiality.
The dispute underscores broader tensions over jurisdiction and accountability in federal law enforcement operations. Government officials from both sides have at times traded public statements, complicating cooperative investigative efforts and deepening community distrust.
What Is Known — and What Remains Unclear
Confirmed:
-
Federal investigations by DHS and supportive FBI personnel are underway.
-
A federal judge has ordered preservation of relevant evidence.
-
Bipartisan political figures have called for an independent and transparent investigation.
Not yet publicly disclosed:
-
Full details of investigative procedures and findings.
-
Whether the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division will open a criminal civil-rights investigation.
-
Comprehensive release of evidence such as body-camera footage to state authorities or the public.
Ongoing Public and Political Impacts
The perceived limitations of the investigation have added to public frustration and political polarization. Democrats are threatening to oppose Department of Homeland Security funding unless greater accountability is established, raising the specter of legislative clashes. Protests in Minneapolis and other cities continue, with demonstrators calling for justice and law enforcement reform.
Local leaders and civil liberties advocates maintain that a transparent and independent investigation is critical to addressing public concerns and ensuring accountability for the use of force by federal agents under immigration enforcement operations.
Sources:
Associated Press; Star Tribune; PBS NewsHour; Washington Post; Reuters; Time.
Tags: Minneapolis Shooting, Alex Pretti, Federal Investigation, DHS, FBI, Civil Rights
News by The Vagabond News.
