Amid Row, CM, DyCM Defend Bulldozer Action
Lucknow | December 28, 2025
By Vagabond News Desk
A political storm erupted on Monday after the state government’s use of bulldozers to demolish allegedly illegal structures drew sharp criticism from opposition parties and civil rights groups, prompting the Chief Minister and Deputy Chief Minister to publicly defend the action as lawful and necessary.
The demolitions, carried out over the past several days in multiple districts, were aimed at what authorities described as “unauthorised constructions” linked to criminal activity and encroachments on public land. Videos of bulldozers tearing down homes and shops quickly circulated on social media, triggering allegations of selective enforcement and abuse of power.
Government’s Stand: “Rule of Law, Not Retribution”
Addressing the controversy, the Chief Minister said the bulldozer action was being conducted strictly in accordance with legal procedures and court orders.
“No one is being targeted for their identity or political beliefs,” the CM said. “This is action against illegal encroachments and criminal assets. The law is equal for everyone.”
Echoing the stance, the Deputy Chief Minister rejected claims of arbitrariness, stating that notices were served in advance and affected parties were given the opportunity to respond.
“Bulldozers are not instruments of punishment,” the DyCM said. “They are tools to reclaim public land and enforce the law.”
Opposition Alleges ‘Bulldozer Justice’
Opposition leaders accused the government of bypassing due process and using demolitions as a form of intimidation.
“This is not governance, this is bulldozer justice,” a senior opposition leader said, demanding a judicial inquiry into the demolitions. Rights groups also questioned whether adequate rehabilitation or alternative arrangements were made for displaced families.
Several petitions challenging the demolitions are expected to be filed in the high court, legal sources said.
Legal and Political Fallout
Legal experts note that while governments have the authority to remove illegal constructions, courts have repeatedly stressed the importance of due process, proportionality, and rehabilitation, particularly when residential structures are involved.
Despite the backlash, the government signaled that the drive would continue.
“We will not retreat under political pressure,” the CM said. “Illegal occupation of public land will not be tolerated.”
As the controversy deepens, the bulldozer — once a symbol of infrastructure development — has again become a flashpoint in India’s intensifying debate over law enforcement, civil liberties, and executive power.
